Abstract

Zambia's record of democracy in the 1990s has been much criticized, at home and abroad. The government of the ruling party, the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) has been accused of perpetuating the hallmarks of the de jure one-party state of the Second Republic (1972-91). Critics claim that one-party dominance by the MMD under President Chiluba's leadership has almost returned the country to a de-facto one-party state. This paper argues there are indeed significant continuities with the past. However, since 1990 the party system has resembled more closely a 'predominant party system'. Far from being a legacy of the Second Republic's one-party-state, its ancestry, and other aspects of contemporary party politics, can be traced back much earlier, even as far back as colonial times. They owe more to enduring patterns of formal institutions and informal practice influencing political behaviour over a longer period than just the Second Republic. In Zambia as elsewhere in Africa democratization requires political organisation to provide strong compensation for the unfavourable socio-economic conditions. For sustainable democracy the political opposition must take its responsibilities more seriously. The paper concludes by reflecting on the party system's likely contribution to democratic transition and consolidation in Zambia beyond the 2001 general elections.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call