Abstract

The partial circulant diallel cross mating scheme of Kempthorne and Curnow (Biometrics 17: 229-250, 1961) was adapted for the evaluation of genotypes in crosses at the interpopulation level. Considering a random sample of n lines from base population I, and that each line is crossed with s lines from opposite population II, there will be ns sampled crosses that are evaluated experimentally. The means of the ns sampled crosses and the remaining n(n - s) crosses can be predicted by the reduced model <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/0291e1.gif" align="absmiddle"> where Yij is the mean of the cross between line i (i = 1,2,...,n) of population I and line j (j = 1',2',...,n') of population II; µ is the general mean, and gi and gj refer to general combining ability effects of lines from populations I and II, respectively. Specific combining ability (Sij) is estimated by the difference <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/0291e2.gif" align="absmiddle">. The sequence of crosses for each line (i) is [i x j], [i x (j + 1)], [i x (j + 2)], ..., [i x (j + s -1)], starting with i = j = 1 for convenience. Any j + s -1 > n is reduced by subtracting n. A prediction procedure is suggested by changing gi and gj by the contrasts <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ti.gif" alt="s_ti.gif (188 bytes)"> i = <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ytra.gif" alt="s_ytra.gif (986 bytes)"> i. - <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ytra.gif" align="absmiddle"> .. and <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ti.gif" align="absmiddle">j = <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ytra.gif" align="absmiddle">.j - <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ytra.gif" align="absmiddle">..; the correlation coefficient (r) was used to compare the efficiency of <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_gtil.gif" align="absmiddle">'s and <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_tiac.gif" align="absmiddle">'s for selection of lines and crosses. The analysis of variance is performed with the complete model Yij = µ + gi + gj + sij + <img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_e_.gif" align="absmiddle">ij, and the sum of squares due to general combining ability is considered for each population separately. An alternative analysis of variance is proposed for estimation of the variance components at the interpopulation level. An analysis of ear length of maize in a partial diallel cross with n = 10 and s = 3 was used for illustration. For the 30 interpopulation crosses analyzed the coefficient of determination (R2), involving observed and estimated hybrid means, was high for the reduced (g) model [R2 (<img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_yac.gif" align="absmiddle">ij, Yij) = 0.960] and smaller for the simplified (<img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_ti.gif" align="absmiddle">) model [R2 (<img src="http:/img/fbpe/gmb/v22n2/s_yac.gif" align="absmiddle">ij, Yij) = 0.889]. Results indicated that the proposed procedure may furnish reliable estimates of means of hybrids not available in the partial diallel.

Highlights

  • The evaluation of genotypes in crosses is a common practice in plant breeding

  • In maize (Zea mays L.), after Jones (1918) suggested the use of double crosses for commercial use, the evaluation of the genetic potential of inbred lines to be used in hybrids was based on all possible combinations among them (Hallauer and Miranda Filho, 1995)

  • Sprague and Tatum (1942) introduced the concept of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) when genotypes are crossed in all possible combinations

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of genotypes in crosses is a common practice in plant breeding. In maize (Zea mays L.), after Jones (1918) suggested the use of double crosses for commercial use, the evaluation of the genetic potential of inbred lines to be used in hybrids was based on all possible combinations among them (Hallauer and Miranda Filho, 1995). The use of the top-cross procedure (Davis, 1927; Jenkins and Brunson, 1932) allowed the evaluation of a greater number of lines in crosses with a common tester. Kempthorne and Curnow (1961) suggested the partial diallel cross to allow the evaluation of a greater number of inbred lines in crosses. According to this procedure, each of the n lines in the set are crossed with s other lines of the same set, instead of (n - 1) lines as in the complete diallel. The partial diallel cross, as proposed by Kempthorne and Curnow (1961), assumes a random sample of lines (genotypes) from one population. In the present study we propose an adaptation of the circulant partial diallel cross of Kempthorne and Curnow (1961) for the evaluation of inbred lines in crosses at the interpopulation level

MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sampled Unsampled
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call