Abstract

It appears that Christian von Blanckenburg presents two contradicting criteria for the modern novel: on the one hand it has to render visible the relationship of causes and effects that shape human life, on the other hand the subjects in fiction should be presented as autonomous and not as their author’s ‘machines.’ I argue that Blanckenburg’s notion of subjects in fiction depends on a ‘biocentric’ model that actually does not apply to the novel and its rhetorical surface. I will then present parrhesia as an alternative concept of authenticity that functions on the novel’s textual surface. I will present the final book of the third version of Wieland’s Geschichte des Agathon as a model case for parrhesia’s role in the construction and function of subjectivity in the 18th -century novel and argue that subjectivity can be understood as the novel’s method of self-authentification.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.