Abstract
There appears to be no general agreement with respect to the efficacyof the parathyroid hormone in the absence of the kidneys. The indications of the inessentiality of the kidneys in the parathyroid control of serum calcium (Ellsworth and Futcher, 1935; Stoerk, 1943; Monahan and Freeman, 1944) have not been fully confirmed (Tweedy et al., 1937; Neufeld and Collip, 1942). On the other hand, Albright and Reifenstein (1948) are of the opinion that “the main action of the parathyroid hormone is to increase phosphate excretion in the urine.” Greep (1948) in his comprehensive review has probably summed up the situation correctly and concisely in his statement that “a true hypercalcemia has never been produced in such an animal” (i.e., in a nephrectomized animal) although he emphasized the adverse biochemical changes resulting from such an operative procedure. Implicit in his statement is the uncertainty regarding the extent of the response elicited by the hormone in the absence of the kidneys.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.