Abstract
The Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Export Competition was lauded as WTO ’ s most significant outcome on agriculture negotiations. However, despite the Decision ’ s requirement that WTO developed country Members immediately eliminate their export subsidies, only Australia has revised its schedule of commitments, scrapping all its export subsidy entitlements. This article therefore analyses the relationship of the Nairobi Decision with the existing obligations under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture; the legal value of the Decision; the challenges in identifying the nature of the Decision; and, whether and how it could have been drafted in a better way to facilitate its implementation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
