Abstract

Informal settlements are the most common form of urbanization on the planet, accounting for one-third of the total urban form. It is expected that by the mid twenty-first century, up to three billion people will live in informal urban environments. However, we lack a consistent mapping method to pinpoint where that informality is located or how it expands. This paper presents the findings from a collection of standardized measurements of 260 informal settlements across the world. The main research goal is to identify a standard global sample of informal neighborhoods. It then focuses on mapping urban growth with remote sensing and direct mapping tools. The third stage classifies settlements based on how adjacency features such as development, topography, or bodies of water relate to their growth. The survey of growth corroborates the idea of informality as expanding geography, although at different rates than previously cited in the literature. We found peri-urban location to be a suitable estimator of informal settlement growth. This finding validates the comparison of multiple settlements to understand rates of change of urban informality worldwide. The findings here are vital to resolve important questions about the role of informal urban development in the context of accelerated global population growth.

Highlights

  • Despite a reported decrease in the relative proportion of the population living in informal settlements between 2000 and 2014, “the absolute number of urban residents who live in slums continued to grow” [1,2]

  • The measurements of areas over time present evidence of the expansion of informal settlements; we looked at the way the physical features that surround the informal neighborhoods condition the way they expand over time

  • The analysis shows how there is a clear advantage for informal settlements to expand if they are not surrounded by any boundary, but it illustrates how surrounding development benefits, with respect to other inhibitors, the growth of informal settlements within a denser context

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite a reported decrease in the relative proportion of the population living in informal settlements between 2000 and 2014 (from 28 percent to 23 percent), “the absolute number of urban residents who live in slums continued to grow” [1,2]. At the national level, based on data collected by states or international agencies, these entities use domestic indexes to compare change across regions [3,4,5]. These valuable index focused studies have concentrated on regional or national measures creating little reliability at the city scale. The second group of studies focuses on single case studies at the neighborhood scale [6,7]. While these exercises present astonishing detail, the single case selection presents problems of generalization of findings

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call