Abstract

Acute vital crisis in end-of-life situations may result in hospitalization and intensive care without recognizable benefit in many cases. Advance directives regarding indications for resuscitation, hospitalization, and symptomatic treatment help ensure that acute complications can be managed quickly and satisfactorily in the patient’s customary surroundings. A plan was designed and implemented in Austrian nursing homes to provide emergency physicians with rapidly obtainable information on the patient’s current situation, and whether resuscitation attempts and hospitalization are advised or not. This palliative treatment plan is arranged by a physician together with caregivers, close relatives, and the patient or his court-appointed health care guardian or holder of power of attorney. Four years after implementation of the plan, a user satisfaction survey was carried out. The majority of participating nurses, emergency physicians and family doctors judged application and design of the palliative treatment plan positively. However, the low response rate of family doctors indicates nonconformity. In particular, the delegation of symptomatic treatment to nurses proved to be controversial. There is still a need to provide up-to-date information and training for health professionals in order for them to understand advance directives as extended autonomy for patients who have lost their ability to make their own decisions.

Highlights

  • The process of planning for future medical care respects a patient’s wishes and general preferences, for situations when the patient becomes unable to participate in decisions about treatment and care [1,2]

  • Questionnaires were distributed by e-mail to family doctors who currently cared for patients in this nursing home, and to emergency physicians from the competent university-affiliated, physician-staffed emergency medical services (EMS) who were on duty within the last four years

  • Responses from nurses, emergency physicians, and family doctors who participated in the survey were mostly positive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The process of planning for future medical care respects a patient’s wishes and general preferences, for situations when the patient becomes unable to participate in decisions about treatment and care [1,2]. Unambiguous agreements and a realistic choice of therapy options proposed by family doctors are vital [5]. This information is important when a life-threatening emergency arises during palliative care, necessitating a call for emergency medical services (EMS). The PTP provides information on whether resuscitation attempts and intensive care are regarded as useful or not by physicians, who have known the patient well for many years. This information is rapidly accessible to nurses and emergency physicians within a few seconds. Four years after implementation of the PTP a prospective assessment aimed to analyze the degree of satisfaction with its application

Experimental Section
Palliative Treatment Plan
Questionnaire
Statistical Analysis
Results and Discussion
Questions Regarding PTP Application
Questions Regarding PTP Design
Strengths and Weaknesses of the PTP
Limitations and the Potential of Conflicts
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call