Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of p16/ki-67 dual stain in the identification of CIN2+ lesions, in Greek women with ASCUS or LSIL cytology.MethodsA total of 200 women, 20 to 60 years old, were enrolled in the study. All samples were cytologically evaluated and performed for p16/ki-67 and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) test. All patients were referred to colposcopy for biopsy and histological evaluation. Three cervical cancer (CC) screening strategies were designed and the total direct medical costs of the procedures during our clinical trial were evaluated, from a healthcare perspective.ResultsHPV 16 as expected was the most common HR-HPV type followed by HPV 31 and HPV 51. The risk for CIN2+ was significantly higher in HPV 16/18 positive cases. p16/ki-67 demonstrated a high sensitivity for CIN2+ identification in both ASCUS and LSIL groups (90.4% and 95%, respectively). HR-HPV test with sensitivity 52.3% and 65.5%, as well as colposcopy with sensitivity 14.3% and 36% respectively in ASCUS and LSIL group, showed inferior results compared to p16/ki-67. The specificity of p16/ki-67 for ASCUS and LSIL was 97.2% and 95.2% respectively, inferior only to colposcopy: 100% and 100%, lacking however statistical significance. HR-HPV test instead, presented the lowest specificity: 76.4% and 71.4% respectively in comparison to the other two methods. From a healthcare perspective, the costs and benefits of the tests implementation for the annual screening and triaging, in three CC screening strategies, were also calculated and discussed.ConclusionsThe results of the study indicate that p16/ki-67 is a safe and rapid assay that could be used to detect CIN2+ among women with mild cervical lesions, presenting both high sensitivity and specificity and could minimize the psychological and economic burden of HPV screening.

Highlights

  • Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women globally

  • The risk for CIN2+ was significantly higher in HPV 16/18 positive cases. p16/ki-67 demonstrated a high sensitivity for CIN2+ identification in both atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) groups (90.4% and 95%, respectively)

  • high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test with sensitivity 52.3% and 65.5%, as well as colposcopy with sensitivity 14.3% and 36% respectively in ASCUS and LSIL group, showed inferior results compared to p16/ki-67

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women globally. It has been established as a great disease model for prolepsis, as it has been significantly reduced during the past decades due to the population-based screening programs and vaccination [1]. The main screening tool for CC has been for many years cytology (Pap test), which contributed to the reduction of the disease in women between 35 to 64 years old, by at least 80% [2,3,4]. The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology has approved three primary CC screening approaches for women between 21 and 65 years old: the cytology, the high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing and the co-testing (cytology plus HPV testing) [5,6,7]. The population compliance is not sufficient, e.g. CC screening coverage in 2018 was 68.8% [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call