The Outcomes of Three Surgical Approaches for Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment: Findings from Vietnam

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation, one of the most common shoulder joint injuries, can be treated by several surgical methods. However, there are still few records about the treatment quality. This study aims to describe the outcomes of three surgical methods for acromioclavicular dislocation treatment at Viet Duc University Hospital, Vietnam. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 patients diagnosed with AC. We retrospectively collected data in the medical records and re-examined the patients. Results: There was no difference between the three groups of surgical approaches relating to the patient’s characteristics, except for the time from the accident to hospital admission. The median length of stay after surgery was highest in the Hook plate group (median (IQR) = 5(2) days), while it was lowest in the K-wire group (median (IQR) = 3(1) days) (p < 0.05). There is statistical significance in the difference of coracoclavicular distance between pre and post-operation in all three surgical method groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: All of the methods—Hook plate, K-wire, and TightRope—were associated with optimistic outcomes and restored initial anatomy. While the three surgical methods are both safe and effective, the K-wire method is associated with a shorter length of stay and might be economical.