Abstract
BackgroundPercutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in coronary artery disease (CAD) with very small vessel diameters remains controversial and challenging. These lesions are usually more diffuse, calcified and tortuous. The usage of thin strut bare metal stents (BMS) with excellent crossing profiles in a very small caliber coronary lesions has increased the likelihood of procedural success.ObjectivesThis observational study assessed the 9-month clinical outcomes in an ‘all-comers’ population with very small caliber CAD after implantation of thin strut cobalt chromium BMS.MethodsThin strut cobalt chromium BMS implantation in a priori pre-defined subgroups was investigated in a non-randomized, international, multi-center ‘all-comers’ observational study. Primary end-point was the 9-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate. Secondary end-points included the 9-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and procedural success rates. Data collection was done using an established electronic data acquisition form with built-in plausibility checks.ResultsA total of 783 patients with a mean age of 70.4 ± 12.8 years were enrolled, 205 (26.2 %) of them had vessel diameters of 2.5 mm and smaller which was defined as CAD with very small reference vessel calibers. Older age and diabetics were associated with higher incidences of very small caliber vessels. The mean reference vessel diameter in the very small vessel group was 2.05 ± 0.27 mm and mean diameter for vessels >2.5 mm was 3.41 ± 0.55 mm. Pre-dilatation was performed more often in the very small vessel patients (52.2 vs. 42.2 %; p value 0.007). There was no difference in the overall technical success rates in very small vessel disease group (97.9 vs. 97.7 %). The 9-month TLR rate was 6.3 % for the very small vessels and 3.7 % for vessels >2.5 mm (p = 0.129). The 9-month and in-hospital MACE rates in the very small vessel group and patient with vessel diameters >2.5 mm were not significantly different (13.1 vs. 9.2 %; p = 0.1265 and 5.2 vs. 3.7 %; p = 0.349) respectively.ConclusionThis study has demonstrated that the use of thin strut cobalt chromium BMS in very small vessel CAD was reasonably safe and efficacious in the context of ‘real-world’ practice.
Highlights
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in coronary artery disease (CAD) with very small vessel diameters remains controversial and challenging
This study has demonstrated that the use of thin strut cobalt chromium bare metal stents (BMS) in very small vessel CAD was reasonably safe and efficacious in the context of ‘real-world’ practice
drug-eluting stent (DES) are preferred as a default treatment strategy, BMS are still implanted for reasons such as limited financial resources in some Asian countries or contraindications to prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
Summary
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in coronary artery disease (CAD) with very small vessel diameters remains controversial and challenging. These lesions are usually more diffuse, calcified and tortuous. The usage of thin strut bare metal stents (BMS) with excellent crossing profiles in a very small caliber coronary lesions has increased the likelihood of procedural success. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in this group of patients is limited by high rates of graft failure (O’Connor et al 1996) whereas percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are associated with increased risks of restenosis and adverse clinical outcomes (Elezi et al 1998). BMS are generally associated with a higher risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR). The cumulative stent thrombosis rate of 1.6 % and the absence of late stent thrombosis within 6 months is remarkably low for an all-comer cohort (Bocksch et al 2010)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.