Abstract

In most lineages, most species have restricted geographic ranges, with only few reaching widespread distributions. How these widespread species reached their current ranges is an intriguing biogeographic and evolutionary question, especially in groups known to be poor dispersers. We reconstructed the biogeographic and temporal origin of the widespread species in a lineage with particularly poor dispersal capabilities, the diving beetle genus Deronectes (Dytiscidae). Most of the ca. 60 described species of Deronectes have narrow ranges in the Mediterranean area, with only four species with widespread European distributions. We sequenced four mitochondrial and two nuclear genes of 297 specimens of 109 different populations covering the entire distribution of the four lineages of Deronectes, including widespread species. Using Bayesian probabilities with an a priori evolutionary rate, we performed (1) a global phylogeny/phylogeography to estimate the relationships of the main lineages within each group and root them, and (2) demographic analyses of the best population coalescent model for each species group, including a reconstruction of the geographical history estimated from the distribution of the sampled localities. We also selected 56 specimens to test for the presence of Wolbachia, a maternally transmitted parasite that can alter the patterns of mtDNA variability. All species of the four studied groups originated in the southern Mediterranean peninsulas and were estimated to be of Pleistocene origin. In three of the four widespread species, the central and northern European populations were nested within those in the northern areas of the Anatolian, Balkan and Iberian peninsulas respectively, suggesting a range expansion at the edge of the southern refugia. In the Mediterranean peninsulas the widespread European species were replaced by vicariant taxa of recent origin. The fourth species (D. moestus) was proven to be a composite of unrecognised lineages with more restricted distributions around the Western and Central Mediterranean. The analysis of Wolbachia showed a high prevalence of infection among Deronectes, especially in the D. aubei group, where all sequenced populations were infected with the only exception of the Cantabrian Mountains, the westernmost area of distribution of the lineage. In this group there was a phylogenetic incongruence between the mitochondrial and the nuclear sequence, although no clear pattern links this discordance to the Wolbachia infection. Our results suggest that, in different glacial cycles, populations that happened to be at the edge of the newly deglaciated areas took advantage of the optimal ecological conditions to expand their ranges to central and northern Europe. Once this favourable ecological window ended populations become isolated, resulting in the presence of closely related but distinct species in the Mediterranean peninsulas.

Highlights

  • The geographic range of the species is a fundamental trait in ecology and biogeography (Brown & Lomolino, 1998)

  • The Pyrenean D. aubei were paraphyletic at the base of a strongly supported clade including first specimens from the Cevennes and from the Alps Maritimes, Italian Alps and south Germany (Black Forest), plus the Alpine D. semirufus (Fig. 2)

  • The analysis of the mitochondrial data alone divided the D. aubei group into two clades well separated geographically: one formed by specimens of D. aubei aubei and D. semirufus from the Alps, Black Forest, French Massif Central and northern Appenines, and the other clade subdivided into two sister groups, one formed by specimens of D. delarouzei and D. aubei sanfilippoi from northern Spain and Pyrenees and the other by D. semirufus from Sicily and central-southern Apennines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The geographic range of the species is a fundamental trait in ecology and biogeography (Brown & Lomolino, 1998). Range size is strongly correlated with extinction probability (Jablonski, 1987), and high probabilities of extinction have been linked with narrow geographical ranges in several taxa (see e.g., Hansen, 1980 for marine invertebrates, Purvis et al, 2000 for mammals, or Rosenfield, 2002 for freshwater fishes) This raises the question of how lineages with a predominance of running water species, and on average smaller geographic ranges, can persist over long evolutionary periods. This is likely due to the asymmetry in the habitat constraints: standing water species have to migrate when their habitat disappears, but the higher stability of running water habitats means that species in them do not need to disperse They tend to lose dispersal capabilities, likely due to their associated cost (see Ribera, 2008 for a review), in some circumstances running water species seem to be able to disperse and reach widespread distributions. These few widespread species may be of disproportionate importance, as potential sources of new species (‘‘diversity pumps,’’ Ribera et al, 2011), but there is very few data on what makes a species in a clade of poor dispersers able to expand its range, or in what circumstances

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call