Abstract
Spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) calculations are carried out to determine the site preference of H adsorption on Pd(100) surface and subsurface. We carefully scrutinize the energy difference between different patterns at θ=0.50 ML and confirm the LEED observation that surface adsorption can form c(2×2) ordering structure. On the contrary, we disclose that p(2×1) structure become more favorable than c(2×2) for subsurface adsorption. These site preferences are rationalized via an analysis of the layer and orbital resolved density of states. Furthermore, we propose that the interstitial charge as a key factor determining the preferred H adsorbed site.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
