Abstract
In 1978, Guinot proposed that, for studies of Earth rotation, the zero point of the apparent “right ascension” coordinate on the true equator should be so chosen that the rate of change of its hour angle is exactly proportional to the inertial rate of rotation of the Earth. It has been subsequently suggested that this concept of the “non-rotating origin” supersede the equinox quite generally as the origin of celestial coordinates. Since this proposal was first put forward, there has been much discussion, and some criticism, from Aoki and his colleagues, both published and in private correspondence. Some of the arguments for and against Guinot's proposal are discussed, as a contribution to the wider debate on reference systems now being carried out under the auspices of the IAU.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
