The origin is in the jurisprudential deduction A comparative study between Al- Hilla and A-Hanafi jurists

Abstract

The comparison occupied a wide area in jurisprudence (Al-Hilli), especially the jurisprudence of the scholar Al-Alamah Al-Hilli (d / 726 AH), as it presented the views of the jurists of the four Islamic schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali). Based on the comparative solution and on the basis of what the leaders of comparative art decided in this school, we have chosen the jurisprudential origin in deduction. To be a comparative lesson between Al (Hillah) jurists and Al (Hanafi) jurists, and it is worth noting that the opinion of Al Hillah jurists is an extension of the opinion of the Imamate - in the most general terms - while preserving the privacy of Al Hillah school of jurisprudence, and the uniqueness of some of its scholars with some views of their own. And because we have adopted their opinions and documented them from their books on the one hand, and because we want to highlight Al Hillih 's opinion, as it represents the jurisprudential opinion of a school of Imami jurisprudence (the school of Hillah); So we said the jurists of the solution, and did not say the jurists of the Imamate. At the same time, we chose the opinions of Al Hanafi jurists over the opinions of other Islamic jurists. Because Al Hanafi school is the oldest of the Islamic schools that branched from the school of the Companions on the one hand, and because its jurisprudential approach to deduction differs from their curricula, and if all belong to one school; So we introduced the jurists of the solution, including the jurisprudence school to which they belong.