Abstract
Recent article "Revisiting the 2PN Pericenter Precession in View of Possible Future Measurements" published by Iorio (Universe, 2020) argues that calculations of the secular 2PN precession of the orbital pericenter of a binary system accomplished by Damour and Schaefer (Nuovo Cim. B, 1988) and by Kopeikin and Potapov (Astron. Rep., 1994) with different mathematical techniques are inconsistent, differ from each other and do not agree with the result obtained by Iorio (Universe, 2020). The purpose of this communication is to demonstrate that the article by Iorio is erroneous, suffers from misconceptions and cannot be trusted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
