Abstract

Abstract : One hundred subjects were run on a foot-hand-eye coordination task. The apparatus used was a collator. It was set up as a simulator as well as the 'real' task. Twenty subjects (10 male and 10 female) were run in each of five conditions. Condition I - training on collating three pages then transferred to collating eight pages. Condition IA - trained on three pages then overtrained before transferring to eight pages. Condition II - trained on five pages then transferred to eight. Condition IIA - trained on five pages then overtrained before transferring to eight. Condition III - trained immediately on eight pages. For the males, overtraining degraded performance on the transfer trials. This was not true for the females. The closer the training was to the 'real' task (8 pagges) the poorer the performance of the males on the transfer performance. Overtraining males who reached criterion early in the initial training had the greater deleterious effect on the transfer trials when compared to those reaching criterion later. This was not true for the females. For the males, no prior training produced the best terminal performance on the transfer task. This was not true for the females. Some suggested explanations of the sex difference are given and some hypothesis are made concerning the optimal use of simulation training. (Author)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.