Abstract
As the number of levels of a hierarchical menu structure grows, users find it difficult to navigate from their current location to their desired location. Despite the navigation problem, designers of menu interfaces may want to trade more depth for less breadth in order to take advantage of funneling. Indeed, Lee and MacGregor (1985) have presented an analysis of search time that suggests that the optimal number of options per menu panel over a wide range of conditions is in the range of only four to eight. However, Lee and MacGregor's analysis applies only to cases where the user cannot restrict the scope of search based on either experience with the menu panel or on the organization of the options on the panel. The analysis is extended to cases of restricted search. Assuming optimal grouping, the optimal number of alternatives on a single page ranges from 16 to 78 across the same parameter values explored by Lee and MacGregor.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
