Abstract

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) registers a preoccupying financial condition since 2002. The existing literature has not yet dealt with the definition of the PBGC’s optimal portfolio policy. This paper builds a theoretical framework for defining its optimal asset allocation in a continuous-time stochastic world. We first recognize the PBGC’s put seller nature and derive optimal portfolio rules inspired by the option hedging literature. We then build a model characteristic of any asset-liability manager, like the PBGC or equivalent bodies in other countries, a defined benefit (DB) pension fund or a defined contribution pension fund subject to a guarantee. The model implementation only requires the availability of the given institution’s balance sheets. We propose an application using the PBGC’s reports in the period 1995-2009. The optimal risky asset proportion, composed of the speculative fund and the cash flow and liabilities hedge terms, appears as low, as the second and - especially - third terms exert a downward pressure on the speculative portfolio component. We eventually compare the asset-liability management principles of the PBGC and a DB pension fund and conclude that, though both institutions have a comparable optimal portfolio structure, their asset allocation differs in the effect of the liabilities hedge fund. Due to a different nature of the PBGC’s and DB pension fund’s liabilities, the corresponding hedge fund decreases (increases) the optimal risky asset proportion in the case of the PBGC (DB pension fund).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call