Abstract
PurposeDimensional measures of retinal features are subject to the optical influence of ocular magnification. We examined the impact of ocular magnification on the association between axial length (AL) and measurements of retinal vessel calibre in fundus photographs. DesignCross-sectional study. ParticipantsEighty-two normal right eyes from healthy participants aged 16-31 years. MethodsCentral retinal arteriolar and venular equivalents (CRAE and CRVE) were derived from colour fundus photographs using semi-automated software. Ordinary least squares linear regression was used to assess the influence of AL (independent variable) on CRAE and CRVE, controlling for age, sex and ethnicity, both before and after magnification correction using different formulae. These formulae estimate magnification based on different ocular parameters: AL only (Bennnett’s formula), refractive error only (Bengtsson’s formula) and refractive error combined with keratometry (Littmann’s formula). Previous research has primarily relied on Bengtsson’s formula, which is less accurate than Bennett’s formula. We also examined the impact of treating the non-telecentric fundus camera used in this study as telecentric when applying these magnification correction formulae. Main Outcome MeasuresCentral retinal arteriolar and venular equivalents (in pixels). ResultsBefore magnification correction, increasing AL was associated with decreasing CRAE (β: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.09, p=0.02) and CRVE (β: -0.91, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.20, p=0.01). After magnification correction, this observation was no longer evident, regardless of the correction formula applied. When inappropriately assuming the fundus camera to be telecentric, we observed a bias towards increasing magnification-corrected CRAE and CRVE with increasing AL (β coefficients were positive or became more positive), reaching statistical significance (p<0.05) for CRAE corrected using Bennett’s or Littmann’s formula, and for CRVE corrected using Bennett’s formula. ConclusionsFailing to correct for ocular magnification results in apparent narrowing of vessels in longer eyes, while inappropriate assumptions about telecentricity during magnification correction introduce an optical artifact that causes apparent widening of vessels. These findings suggest that myopic changes in retinal vessel calibre are optical (not biological) in nature. Proper correction of this effect to accurately derive dimensional measures is a crucial—yet often overlooked—methodological consideration in “oculomics” research investigating retinal biomarkers of systemic conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.