Abstract
This research aims to find out the most correct opinion on an important jurisprudential issue. In which the jurists differed, which is the reading of the follower of Surat Al-Fatihah in the aloud prayer, starting with the weighting of Sheikh Abi Bakr, the Kurdish workbook in it, and then bringing the doctrines of the jurists, and their evidence, and explaining the aspect of the evidence from it, by referring to the approved jurisprudential books that were contained in it, concluding with mentioning the opinion of the researcher towards this difference; based on the comparative method.The research reached several results; Most notably: the obligation of the follower to read Surat Al-Fatihah in the silent prayer, and not to read it in the prayer out loud; Since he is commanded to listen to the imam, and there are no strokes for the imam in which the reading of Al-Fatihah can accommodate.Keywords: Abu Ba
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
