Abstract

AbstractThe opening of wind-driven coastal polynyas has often been investigated using idealised flux models. Polynya flux models postulate that the boundary separating the region of thin ice adjacent to the coast within the polynya from the thicker ice piling up downstream is a mathematical shock. To conserve mass, any divergence of the ice flux across the shock translates into a change in the shock’s position or, in other words, a change in the width of the thin-ice region of the polynya. Polynya flux models are physically incomplete in that, while they conserve ice mass, they do not conserve linear momentum. In this paper, we investigate the improvements that can be achieved in the simulation of polynyas by imposing conservation of momentum as well as mass. We start by adopting a mathematically solid formulation of the ice mass and momentum balances throughout the polynya region, from the coast to the pack ice. Hydrostatic and plastic versions of the ice internal forces are used in the model. Two different approaches are then explored. We first postulate the existence of a shock at the seaward edge of the thin-ice region of the polynya and derive jump conditions for the conservation of ice mass and momentum at the shock which are consistent with the continuous model physics. Polynyas simulated by this mass- and momentum-conserving shock model always reach a steady state if the polynya forcing is uniform in space and constant in time. This is also true for all polynya flux models presented previously in the literature, but the location of the steady-state polynya edge and the time required to reach it can greatly differ between shock formulations and more simplistic flux ones. We next relax the assumption that a shock exists and let the boundary between thin ice and piling up ice emerge naturally as part of the full solution of the continuous model equations. Polynyas simulated in this way are very different from those simulated by either shock or flux models. Most notably, we find that steady-state polynya solutions are not always attainable in the continuous model. We determine under which conditions this is so and explain how such unsteady solutions come about. We also show that, in those cases when a steady-state solution exists in the continuous model, the steady-state polynya width is considerably larger than in the shock model, and the time required to attain it is accordingly longer. The occurrence of such significant differences between the polynya solutions calculated with flux and shock models, on the one hand, and with more sophisticated continuous formulations, on the other hand, suggests that the former are, at best, incomplete, and should be used with caution.

Highlights

  • Wind-driven coastal polynyas are regions of open water or new ice adjacent to the shoreline that form in frozen polar oceans when offshore winds propel the sea ice away from the coast

  • We study the polynya opening process in the hydrostatic and plastic rheology limits separately, in anticipation that results from both idealised cases will shed valuable light into the polynya dynamics, but bearing in mind that a realistic polynya rheology will be significantly more complicated than either of the idealised rheology cases studied by us. (vi) Intimately related with the rheology simplifications just mentioned, is the fact that the model assumes that all ice properties, not just rheology, are uniform throughout the polynya

  • We show that the reason why shock concepts are not verified by the continuous model is that the momentum balance implied by the Rankine–Hugoniot conditions is never obtained in the continuous model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wind-driven coastal polynyas are regions of open water or new ice adjacent to the shoreline that form in frozen polar oceans when offshore winds propel the sea ice away from the coast. The solutions to (4.4) are the abscissas of the intersection points between the curves nhn−1 and A τs − Up2 Up. do not exist, the new-ice region must recede to x = ∞ because, to what was argued in § 4.1.1, the internal forces are not able to balance the combined wind and bottom stresses at the same time as the ice moves as a rigid-body at speed Up. It is straightforward to determine when non-negative roots of (4.4) exist the following They never occur in the hydrostatic case nor in the plastic rheology case when 1 n < 2, transient quasi-steady states are possible in the latter case This difference of behaviour between shock and continuous models is due to the very different dynamics of the consolidating and new-ice region, which, in shock and flux models, is assumed to be always moving as a rigid body. We use a numerical model to investigate in some more detail the dynamics of the steady-state and unsteady solutions discussed above

Numerical polynya solutions
Findings
Hydrostatic pressure case
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.