Abstract

The development of hand preference and other lateralized behaviors has received a considerable amount of attention by a number of investigators (Hahn, 1987; Molfese & Segalowitz, 1988). Understanding the ontogeny of hand preference is important from a both a developmental and a comparative perspective because of the differing theoretical perspectives utilized in explaining “handedness” in its adult form. For example, in the review articles on nonhuman primate handedness by MacNeilage, Studdert-Kennedy, and Lindblom (1987), as well as Fagot and Vauclair (1991), the testing of immature or younger subjects are cited as possible factors influencing the expression of hand preference in nonhuman primates. This is particularly important because recent data on reaching in human infants indicates that preferences can switch from an initial left hand preference to a right hand preference with increasing age (Harris & Carlson, 1988; Young, Segalowitz, Corter, & Trehub, 1983). Thus, comparing hand preference distributions of infant and adult subjects of different species are important for understanding how asymmetries emerge in the course of development.KeywordsNonhuman PrimateHand PreferenceLateralized BehaviorRight HandCerebral LateralizationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.