The onset of sound wave distortion and cavitation in water and sea water

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a review of micromirror array (MMA) technologies (2631 MMA research papers and patents were reviewed for this effort). The performance capabilities of 277 MMA designs from 49 companies and 23 academic research groups are categorized and compared. The designs are categorized according to (i) their array’s dimension (e.g., 2D arrays consisting of mirrors that cover a surface, 1D arrays consisting of mirrors in a row, and 0D arrays consisting of only a single mirror), (ii) the nature of the surface of their mirrors (e.g., continuous or discrete), (iii) what combination of tip, tilt, and/or piston degrees of freedom (DOFs) they achieve, and (iv) how they are actuated. Standardized performance metrics that can be systematically applied to every MMA design (e.g., mirror area, fill factor, pitch, range of motion, maximum acceleration, actuator energy density, and number of uncontrolled DOFs) are defined and plotted for existing designs to enable their fair comparison. Theoretical bounds on what is physically possible for MMAs to achieve are also derived and depicted in these plots to highlight the amount of performance improvement that remains to be achieved by future designs and guidelines are provided to aid in the development of these future designs.