Abstract
This article launches first into its discussion on the features of the main board structures in Asia. Singapore, China and Japan are used as reference jurisdictions for the purposes of illustrating the workings of the one-tier, two-tier and hybrid board structures respectively. The article then proceeds to evaluate the failures of the board structures in the three jurisdictions, owing to structural weaknesses and contextual particularities. Thereafter, it analyses and evaluates the potential for convergence of a singular board structure in Asia. The article concludes by highlighting potential areas for reform and offering final conclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have