The Ohm Is Where the Art Is: British Telegraph Engineers and the Development of Electrical Standards

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessInstruments & AuthorityThe Ohm Is Where the Art Is: British Telegraph Engineers and the Development of Electrical StandardsBruce J. HuntBruce J. Hunt Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 9, Number 11994Instruments Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368729 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 32Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Rebecca L. Jackson “The Uncertain Method of Drops”: How a Non-Uniform Unit Survived the Century of Standardization, Perspectives on Science 29, no.66 (Nov 2021): 802–841.https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00395JOHN HANDEL The Material Politics of Finance: The Ticker Tape and the London Stock Exchange, 1860s–1890s, Enterprise & Society 80 (Mar 2021): 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.3Peter M. Grant, John S. Thompson Standardization of the Ohm as a Unit of Electrical Resistance, 1861–1867, Proceedings of the IEEE 107, no.1111 (Nov 2019): 2281–2289.https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2945495Richard Noakes Physics and Psychics, 23 (Sep 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882436Peter M Grant, John S Thompson Standardisation of the Unit of Electrical Resistance, (Sep 2019): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1109/HISTELCON47851.2019.9039959Daniel Jon Mitchell “The Etherealization of Common Sense?” Arithmetical and Algebraic Modes of Intelligibility in Late Victorian Mathematics of Measurement, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 73, no.22 (Nov 2018): 125–180.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-018-0218-yJan Gyllenbok A–Z of Scientific and Informal Measures, (Apr 2018): 33–238.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57598-8_3Isobel Falconer No actual measurement … was required: Maxwell and Cavendish's null method for the inverse square law of electrostatics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 65-66 (Oct 2017): 74–86.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.001Terry Quinn From artefacts to atoms - A new SI for 2018 to be based on fundamental constants, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (Aug 2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.07.003Daniel Jon Mitchell Making sense of absolute measurement: James Clerk Maxwell, William Thomson, Fleeming Jenkin, and the invention of the dimensional formula, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 58 (May 2017): 63–79.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.08.004Sybil G. de Clark The dimensions of the magnetic pole: a controversy at the heart of early dimensional analysis, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 70, no.33 (Oct 2015): 293–324.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-015-0168-6Simon Reif-Acherman Georg Simon Ohm and the First Comprehensive Theory of Electrical Conductivity in Metals [Scanning our Past], Proceedings of the IEEE 104, no.11 (Jan 2016): 198–209.https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2503461Simon Reif-Acherman Augustus Matthiessen: His Studies on Electrical Conductivities and the Origins of his “Rule” [Scanning Our Past], Proceedings of the IEEE 103, no.44 (Apr 2015): 713–721.https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2414487MICHAEL KERSHAW ‘A thorn in the side of European geodesy’: measuring Paris–Greenwich longitude by electric telegraph, The British Journal for the History of Science 47, no.44 (Feb 2014): 637–660.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000988RICHARD NOAKES Industrial research at the Eastern Telegraph Company, 1872–1929, The British Journal for the History of Science 47, no.11 (Apr 2013): 119–146.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000174Simone Müller-Pohl Working the Nation State: Submarine Cable Actors, Cable Transnationalism and the Governance of the Global Media System, 1858–1914, (Sep 2012): 101–123.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32934-0_6Aashish Velkar Globalization and Voluntary Consensus Standardization in the British Wire Industry, 1880, (Jan 2013): 45–70.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263636_3William P. Fisher Measurement, Reduced Transaction Costs, and the Ethics of Efficient Markets for Human, Social, and Natural Capital, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2340674FALK MÜLLER Johann Wilhelm Hittorf and the material culture of nineteenth-century gas discharge research, The British Journal for the History of Science 44, no.22 (Nov 2010): 211–244.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087410001329Aashish Velkar Transactions, standardisation and competition: Establishing uniform sizes in the British wire industry c.1880, Business History 51, no.22 (Mar 2009): 222–247.https://doi.org/10.1080/00076790902726582William P. Fisher Distinguishing between Consistency and Error in Reliability Coefficients: Improving the Estimation and Interpretation of Information on Measurement Precision, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1685556Iwan Rhys Morus Working out in the nineteenth century, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38, no.33 (Sep 2007): 605–609.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.06.008Iwan Rhys Morus The Two Cultures of Electricity: Between Entertainment and Edification in Victorian Science, Science & Education 16, no.66 (Sep 2014): 593–602.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9023-0Michael Kershaw The international electrical units: a failure in standardisation?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38, no.11 (Mar 2007): 108–131.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.012 The Philosophical Magazine, (Aug 2003): 261–274.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482272611-12Crosbie Smith Force, Energy, and Thermodynamics, (Jan 2001): 289–310.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.017Bruce J. Hunt Electrical Therory and Practice in the Nineteenth Century, (Jan 2001): 311–328.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.018Bruce J. Hunt Scientists, engineers and Wildman Whitehouse: measurement and credibility in early cable telegraphy, The British Journal for the History of Science 29, no.22 (Jan 2009): 155–169.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400034208Kathryn M. Olesko Precision, Tolerance, and Consensus: Local Cultures in German and British Resistance Standards, (Jan 1996): 117–156.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1784-2_4Sungook Hong Forging Scientific Electrical Engineering: John Ambrose Fleming and the Ferranti Effect, Isis 86, no.11 (Oct 2015): 30–51.https://doi.org/10.1086/357074 John Neu Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 1995, Isis 86 (Oct 2015): 1–331.https://doi.org/10.1086/357399Andrew L. Russell Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s, (): 25–57.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139856553.004