The off-label utilization of prothrombin complex concentrate with cryoprecipitate as an alternative to plasma transfusion in bleeding patients with acute right ventricular failure

Abstract

To the Editor, The coagulopathic patient with right ventricular failure presents a conundrum to the perioperative clinician. Because these patients are preload dependent, hemorrhage may rapidly result in cardiogenic shock and end-organ ischemia. Acute coagulation factor replacement to correct factor deficiencies and reverse bleeding entails the transfusion of a large volume of plasma (10-15 mL kg), which will increase most coagulation factors by 20-30% so as to approach the 30-40% target levels considered adequate for hemostasis. In turn, however, such large transfusion volumes can potentially decrease left ventricular preload and cardiac output through ventricular interdependence. Furthermore, when the surgical setting is cardiothoracic, volume overload may promote catastrophic wound or graft dehiscence. When confronted with such complex coagulopathic patients, we have administered the combination of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) with cryoprecipitate as a lower-volume alternative to plasma transfusion. The combination of 1,000 units of a four-factor prothrombin complex and 10 units of cryoprecipitate provides most coagulation factors in doses comparable with four units of plasma, but at less than 15% of the volume (Table). We acknowledge that neither Factor V nor Factor XI is present in significant quantities in either PCCs or cryoprecipitate but propose that these shortfalls are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. The platelet transfusions that many hemorrhaging patients require (particularly in the setting of the acquired thrombasthenia of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits) likely provide an alternative source of Factor V, as 20% of circulating Factor V is contained within platelet alpha granules. While Factor XI concentrates are available, they are not currently licensed in Canada and are therefore difficult to obtain. Furthermore, the significance of not replenishing Factor XI in a patient with global coagulopathy is unclear. In patients with congenital Factor XI deficiency, for example, there is a poor correlation between factor levels and bleeding tendency, possibly reflecting the ability of tissue-factor(TF)/Factor VII to activate Factor IX, Factor XI’s natural substrate. As one of the hemostatic mechanisms of Factor XI is the induction of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, the co-administration of antifibrinolytic medications, such as tranexamic acid (considered a standard of care in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery), may also provide some compensation for relative Factor XI deficiency in hemorrhaging patients. Given the above, with the long circulating half-life of Factor XI at 50 hr and its thrombogenicity when plasma levels exceed 70%, we do not endorse specific replacement in this setting. Our anecdotal experience regarding the hemostatic efficacy of PCCs when combined with cryoprecipitate suggests that the combination may be a useful alternative to plasma in patients with global coagulopathy who are unable to tolerate plasma transfusions, particularly if they are already being managed concurrently with platelet transfusions and A. Alam, MD (&) C. Cserti-Gazdewich, MD J. Pendergrast, MD Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada e-mail: asim.alam@sunnybrook.ca