Abstract

BackgroundThere is not yet a valid and evidence-based system to classify patients with MDD into more homogeneous subtypes based on their clinical features. This study aims to identify symptom-based subtypes of MDD and investigate whether the treatment outcomes of those subtypes would be different. MethodThe cohort was established at 12 densely populated cities of China. A total of 1487 patients were enrolled. All participants were 18–65 years old and diagnosed with MDD. Participants were followed up at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, and months 4 and 6. K-means algorithm was used to cluster patients with MDD according to clinical symptoms. The network analysis was adopted to characterize and compare the symptom patterns in the clusters. We also examined the associations between the clusters and the clinical outcomes. ResultsThe optimal number of the clusters was determined to be 2. Each cluster's maximum Jaccard Co-efficient was calculated to be >0.5 (cluster1 = 0.53, cluster 2 = 0.67). The symptom “depressed mood” and some other affective symptoms were the most prominent in cluster 1. Somatic symptoms, such as weight loss and general somatic symptoms, had the greatest expected influence in cluster 2. Compared with the response rates of the patients in the “somatic cluster”, those of the patients in the “affective cluster” were significantly higher (P < 0.05). ConclusionsPatients with MDD might be classified into two symptom-based subtypes featured with affective symptoms or somatic symptoms. The treatment efficacy and prognosis of the subtype featured with somatic symptoms may be worse.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call