Abstract

The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir at The Geysers geothermal field in California. In this paper, the results of coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) analyses made using a model developed as part of the pre-stimulation phase of the EGS demonstration project is presented. The model simulations were conducted in order to investigate injection strategies and the resulting effects of cold-water injection upon the EGS system; in particular to predict the extent of the stimulation zone for a given injection schedule. The actual injection began on October 6, 2011, and in this paper a comparison of pre-stimulation model predictions with micro-earthquake (MEQ) monitoring data over the first few months of a one-year injection program is presented. The results show that, by using a calibrated THM model based on historic injection and MEQ data at a nearby well, the predicted extent of the stimulation zone (defined as a zone of high MEQ density around the injection well) compares well with observed seismicity. The modeling indicates that the MEQ events are related to shear reactivation of preexisting fractures, which is triggered by the combined effects of injection-induced cooling around the injection well and small changes in steam pressure as far as half a kilometer away from the injection well. Pressure-monitoring data at adjacent wells and satellite-based ground-surface deformation data were also used to validate and further calibrate reservoir-scale hydraulic and mechanical model properties. The pressure signature monitored from the start of the injection was particularly useful for a precise back-calculation of reservoir porosity. The first few months of reservoir pressure and surface deformation data were useful for estimating the reservoir-rock permeability and elastic modulus. Finally, although the extent of the calculated stimulation zone matches the field observations over the first few months of injection, the observed surface deformations and MEQ evolution showed more heterogeneous behavior as a result of more complex geology, including minor faults and fracture zones that are important for consideration in the analysis of energy production and the long-term evolution of the EGS system.

Highlights

  • The Geysers geothermal field in California (Fig. 1(a)) is the largest geothermalelectricity-generating operation in the world and has been in commercial production since 1960

  • Hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) modeling have been conducted to simulate water injection for stimulation associated with the Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Demonstration Project, California

  • The prestimulation modeling aimed at predicting the injection-induced spatial extent of the stimulation zone as observed from monitoring of MEQ activity around the wells

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Geysers geothermal field in California (Fig. 1(a)) is the largest geothermalelectricity-generating operation in the world and has been in commercial production since 1960. The plan put forward for the Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project was to reopen and recomplete two of the abandoned exploratory wells and deepen them for injection and stimulation in the HTZ, using injection water provided by the existing Santa Rosa Geysers Recharge pipeline. In addition to real-time MEQ monitoring and analysis, the field monitoring and data analyses include (1) three-dimensional tomography and high-precision location source studies of MEQ events, (2) satellite-based monitoring of ground-surface deformation, and (3) geochemical monitoring analysis of injection and production fluids (Fig. 3) These technologies are promising for monitoring and validating the EGS, because they are expected to capture important changes in the geothermal reservoir at the kilometer scale, including changes in rock-mass mechanical properties (as reflected by changes in sonic velocities) and exposure of new fracture surfaces (as reflected by changes in the chemical signature of the produced steam). It is shown that the prestimulation modeling using a simplified representation of geology could predict the lateral extent of the stimulation zone encompassing the injection/production well pair, field data indicate the influence of more complex geological structures that will be included in future models of the field

Modeling Approach
THM Input Parameters
Calibration of MEQ Criterion by Modeling Aidlin 11 Injection
Model Calibration Against Data on Reservoir Pressure and Ground Deformation
Comparison of Calculated MEQ Potential with Seismic Density
Findings
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call