The Nomological Network of a Behavioral Distress Tolerance Task in Veterans.

Abstract

There is a relative lack of research on distress tolerance (DT) in veteran samples. The aims of the study were to (a) evaluate convergent and discriminant validity of a behavioral measure of DT compared to theoretically similar (i.e., self-report DT, negative urgency) and dissimilar (i.e., risk-taking) constructs and (b) evaluate the concurrent validity of DT in relation to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms in a veteran sample. A sample of U.S. veterans who served after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks (N = 306, 89.9% male; M age 30.2 years, SD = 4.5, range: 21-40 years) completed self-report and behavioral measures of DT, risk-taking, impulsivity, and depressive symptoms, and completed a clinical interview for PTSD. Results of a multitrait-multimethod matrix found significant yet minimal shared variance, r2 = .01-.03, ps = .002-.055, between the self-report and behavioral measures of DT. We used a series of multiple regressions to examine the relative contribution of the behavioral and self-report DT measures in the prediction of PTSD and depressive symptoms. Self-reported, but not behavioral, DT accounted for unique variance in PTSD, r2 = .12, p < .001, and depressive symptoms, r2 = .23, p < .001. Participants with PTSD or higher scores on measures of depression were more likely to report greater increases in frustration and irritability after completing the behavioral task. Results indicate that DT is not a unidimensional construct and must be considered in the context of specific emotions (e.g., tolerance of irritability vs. fear) and contexts (e.g., behavioral, affective).