Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the correlation between firm size, growth and profitability along with other firm-specific variables (like leverage, competition and asset tangibility), macroeconomic variable (like GDP growth-business cycle) and stock market development variable (like MCR).Design/methodology/approachUsing the COMPUSTAT Global database this work uses panel dynamic fixed effects model for nearly 12,001 unique non-financial listed and active firms from 1995 to 2016 for 12 industrial and emerging Asia–Pacific economies. This interrelationship was also examined for small, medium and large size companies classified based on three alternate measures such as total assets, net sales and MCR of firms.FindingsThe persistence of profits coefficient was found to be positive and modest. There is evidence of a negative size-profitability and positive growth-profitability relationship suggesting that initially profitability increases with the growth of the firm but eventually, overtime, gains in profit rates reduce, as size increases indicting that large size breeds inefficiency. The relationship between firm's leverage ratio and its asset tangibility is found to be negative with profitability. The business cycle and stock market development variables suggest a positive relationship with the profitability of firms. However, the significance of estimated coefficients was mixed and varied among different selected Asia–Pacific economies.Practical implicationsThe study has economic implications on issues such as industrial concentration, risk and optimum size of firms for practicing managers of modern enterprise in emerging markets.Originality/valueThe analysis of the relationship between the firm size, growth and profitability is uniquely determined under a dynamic panel fixed effects framework using firm-specific variables along with macroeconomic and financial development determinants of profitability. This relationship is estimated for a large and new data set of 12 industrial and emerging Asia–Pacific economies.

Highlights

  • The present work tries to empirically examine two traditional questions of business and industrial economics: first, what is the relationship between firm size and profitability? and second what is the association between firm growth and profitability? Both theoretical and empirical discussions have led to inconsistent and contradictory conclusions

  • The analysis of the relationship between the firm size, growth and profitability is uniquely determined under a dynamic panel fixed effects framework using firm-specific variables along with macroeconomic and financial development determinants of profitability

  • The interrelationship between firm size, growth and profitability is examined for small, medium and large size companies classified based on three alternate measures such as total assets, net sales and market capitalization ratio of firms which further provides additional evidence based on different size classes using alternate size variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present work tries to empirically examine two traditional questions of business and industrial economics: first, what is the relationship between firm size and profitability? and second what is the association between firm growth and profitability? Both theoretical and empirical discussions have led to inconsistent and contradictory conclusions. The present work tries to empirically examine two traditional questions of business and industrial economics: first, what is the relationship between firm size and profitability? Early theories of business economics have recognized the role of economies of scale (Alexander, 1949; Stekler, 1964; Hall and Weiss, 1967; Scherer, 1973) and other technical and economic efficiencies associated with larger business firms. Baumol (1959) in his seminal work hypothesized a positive relationship between firm size and business profitability. Baumol (1959) contended that large firms are capable of enhancing the investment opportunities, which bring larger profit rates, but the smaller firms cannot take them because of financial difficulties. Baumol (1959) states his hypothesis on the firm size and profitability as, “other things being equal, the large firm can ordinarily obtain profits at least as large, and perhaps larger, than the smaller enterprise”

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call