Abstract

A new problem in health care priority-setting is currently emerging for wealthy countries: what should be done when a new drug is considered cost effective but implementing it would still be unaffordable? The standard approach to setting priorities in health care rests on cost effectiveness. This approach is now being tested by new drugs that are highly effective but very costly. Because they are so effective, these drugs deliver "value for money" despite their high cost. However, when the targeted condition affects a sizeable number of patients, implementing the drugs becomes unaffordable. There are no easy alternatives. A key virtue of setting health care priorities with a presumptive cost-effectiveness threshold is that it provides all patients a prima facie equal claim on the available resources, and alternative approaches to addressing affordability face their own challenges.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call