Abstract
Conservation biology has traditionally focused on the fine scale and the species level of biological organization (Soule and Wilcox 1980), and biotic conservation is only one of the various goals that has directed the preservation and management of natural areas and resources. Resource management goals have largely been utilitarian or commercial, such as the maintenance of large areas for watersheds; preservation of marshes, bogs, and seasonal wetlands for flood water storage, nursery areas, and flow continuity in river systems, and the sustained yield of forests, fisheries, and wildlife (Temple et al. 1988; Aplet, Laven, and Fiedler in press). There have, however, been both practically and theoretically motivated calls for widening the focus to include scales beyond that of the individual site and levels of organization above that of the species (Soule 1989; Western 1989) to approach new goals. This essay will explore the relationship of this new frontier for conservation biology to advances in ecology. Much of the new ecological focus of conservation biology is driven by the shift in the overarching paradigm of ecology itself. We begin by defining the concept of paradigm and characterizing the classical paradigm of ecology. The classical paradigm had definite implications for conservation, and these are shown to be problematical. Therefore, we outline the contemporary paradigm in ecology and show how the science of ecology has been affected by the shift in paradigm.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.