Abstract

This essay examines some aspects of the interplay of federal and state courts, and in particular the United States Supreme Court and state supreme courts, in the interpretation of federal and state constitutional guarantees of fundamental rights. It first examines the formal aspects of delineating the concurrent jurisdictions at federal and state levels, before proceeding to a substantive analysis of vertical judicial federalism. It ultimately turns to the causes and motivations of state supreme courts to interpret their constitutional guarantees differently from their federal counterpart(s) and discusses the benefits of a constructive intra-federal judicial dialogue for the advancement of rights in general.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call