Abstract

PurposeThere are three major changes in the new definition of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) compared with the traditional definition: (1) onset prior to 18 years, (2) must include tonic seizure, (3) generalized slow spike-waves (SSW) and (instead of or) generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA) on electroencephalography (EEG). We investigated the practical implications and potential limitations of the new LGS definition based on a large cohort of patients in an exploratory study. MethodsThis was a retrospective database study. All patients with an electro-clinical diagnosis of LGS (based on its traditional definition) at the outpatient epilepsy clinic at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran were included (from 2008 until 2020). Patients were reclassified based on the new definition of LGS. ResultsIn total, 3737 patients were registered. Based on its traditional definition, 300 patients were diagnosed as having LGS. According to the new definition of LGS, only 96 patients (32% of the traditional cohort) had LGS. One patient, who had other criteria, had and age at onset of 21 years; 29 patients (9.7%) did not have SSW in their EEGs; 139 people (46.3%) did not have GPFA in their EEGs; and, 111 patients (37%) did not report having tonic seizures. ConclusionThe new International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition of LGS has some important practical implications and limitations. Before reinforcing and making this new definition compulsory in future research and clinical practice, more work is needed to enlighten various aspects of such changes in the definition of this epilepsy syndrome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call