Abstract
FOR more than ten years, biologists have been puzzled by reports from the U.S.S.R. about the 'new genetics' of Lysenko and his school. According to T J se reports, Lysenko had repudiated Mendelism, and in its place he had established a new genetics, founded on the authority of Darwin and Michurin, and elaborated from his own experiments. The new genetics took no account of segregation. It did not admit phenotype or genotype. It denied that chromosomes played any special part in heredity. It claimed that inherited characters were transmitted through the sap from stock to scion in grafts. It demonstrated that in open pollination, picturesquely called 'love marriage', the ovum selects the gamete it desires. It contrasted the outward appearance of a plant (called its 'shirt') with its physiological character (called its 'soul'). It condemned the work of Mendel, Bateson and Morgan as clerical, bourgeois-capitalistic and fascist. It disdained the use of statistics, controls and such-like experimental techniques. It fought its way to recognition with the weapons of the medieval schoolmen: appeal to authority; a priori assumptions based on dialectical materialism; and the compelling pragmatic test that, by the new genetics, nurture henceforth takes charge over nature. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union By P. S. Hudson R. H. Richens. Pp. 88. (Cambridge: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1946.) 6s. net.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
