Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this prospective, randomized‐controlled study is to analyze the outcomes of a new graft technique in tympanoplasty and compare its outcomes with cartilage island graft plus extra perichondrium.MethodsA total of 44 patients with noncomplicated chronic otitis media were included in this prospective randomized‐controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into 2 double‐layer graft groups: The cartilage island graft + cubism graft (study group) and the cartilage island graft + extra perichondrium (control group). The main outcome measures of the study were the air‐bone gap (ABG), ABG gain, and graft status.ResultsGraft success rate was 100% and 95.5% in the study group and the control group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the postoperative first month ABG and ABG gain between study and control groups (P < .05). ABG and ABG gain showed no significant differences in the postoperative sixth month between groups (P > .05).ConclusionThis study revealed that both graft techniques have satisfactory functional and morphological results compared to preoperative findings. The use of cubism graft with cartilage island graft has significantly better auditory outcomes in short‐term and similar results in long‐term compared to double‐layered cartilage island graft with extra perichondrium. Cubism graft is a highly promising graft technique with its many advantages.Level of Evidence1b.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call