The New Criticism: Pro and Contra

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe New Criticism: Pro and ContraRené WellekRené Wellek Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Inquiry Volume 4, Number 4Summer, 1978 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/447958 Views: 59Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1978 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Vincenz Pieper Literary Appreciation in the Framework of Positivism, Journal of Literary Theory 14, no.11 (Feb 2020): 76–93.https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2020-0005Nicolas Vandeviver Cold Reading, (Sep 2019): 29–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27351-4_2Tristram Wolff That's Close Enough: The Unfinished History of Emotivism in Close Reading, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 134, no.11 (Oct 2020): 51–65.https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2019.134.1.51William E. Cain British and American New Criticism, (Apr 2018): 9–23.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958933.ch1 The verbal icon, (Oct 2015): 43–83.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757759-8David-Antoine Williams Method as tautology in the digital humanities, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30, no.22 (Nov 2013): 280–293.https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt068DANIEL WICKBERG IN THE ENVIRONMENT OF IDEAS: ARTHUR LOVEJOY AND THE HISTORY OF IDEAS AS A FORM OF CULTURAL HISTORY, Modern Intellectual History 11, no.0202 (Jun 2014): 439–464.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244314000080Daniel P. Tokaji , Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 9, no.44 ( 2010): 421.https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2010.9407K. M. Newton Is Literary Interpretation Defensible?, (Jan 1986): 1–44.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18447-7_1Rory Ryan Pathologies of epistemology in literary studies∗, Journal of Literary Studies 1, no.11 (Jul 2007): 3–42.https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718508529741C.J. van Rees ‘Theory of literature’ viewed as a conception of literature. On the premises underlying wellek and Warren's handbook, Poetics 13, no.66 (Dec 1984): 501–533.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(84)90021-4Charles Conrad Phases, pentads, and dramatistic critical process, Central States Speech Journal 35, no.22 (May 2009): 94–104.https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978409368169C.J. Van Rees How a literacy work becomes a masterpiece: On the threefold selection practised by literary criticism, Poetics 12, no.4-54-5 (Nov 1983): 397–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90015-3Paul B. Armstrong The Conflict of Interpretations and the Limits of Pluralism, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 98, no.33 (Oct 2020): 341–352.https://doi.org/10.2307/462275C. Van Boheemen-Saaf Contemporary american literary criticism: A reconnaissance of its continental connections, Neophilologus 64, no.11 (Jan 1980): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01513492 Gerald Graff New Criticism Once More, Critical Inquiry 5, no.33 (Oct 2015): 569–575.https://doi.org/10.1086/448007