Abstract

We examine a simple game in which males and females have different preferences over sex and children, and gender-biased asymmetric strategies. We attempt to characterize the fundamental tradeoffs in a static game of complete information. We find that plausible differences in preferences can account for observed time-trends in the so-called happiness gender gap, following the introduction of a single technology which may prevent conception and yields no dis-utility to men. The model suggests that men may have benefitted more than women from the introduction of the Pill, and raises the question of whether alternative forms of family planning might better equalize the relative positions of men and women in sexual partnerships. These findings have particular relevance for feminist critiques of the sexual revolution.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.