Abstract

Previous findings have indicated that pain relieving medications such as opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be neuroprotective after traumatic brain injury in rodents, but only limited studies have been performed in a blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) model. In addition, many pre-clinical TBI studies performed in rodents did not use analgesics due to the possibility of neuroprotection or other changes in cognitive, behavioral, and pathology outcomes. To examine this in a pre-clinical setting, we examined the neurobehavioral changes in rats given a single pre-blast dose of meloxicam, buprenorphine, or no pain relieving medication and exposed to tightly-coupled repeated blasts in an advanced blast simulator and evaluated neurobehavioral functions up to 28 days post-blast. A 16.7% mortality rate was recorded in the rats treated with buprenorphine, which might be attributed to the physiologically depressive side effects of buprenorphine in combination with isoflurane anesthesia and acute brain injury. Rats given buprenorphine, but not meloxicam, took more time to recover from the isoflurane anesthesia given just before blast. We found that treatment with meloxicam protected repeated blast-exposed rats from vestibulomotor dysfunctions up to day 14, but by day 28 the protective effects had receded. Both pain relieving medications seemed to promote short-term memory deficits in blast-exposed animals, whereas vehicle-treated blast-exposed animals showed only a non-significant trend toward worsening short-term memory by day 27. Open field exploratory behavior results showed that blast exposed rats treated with meloxicam engaged in significantly more locomotor activities and possibly a lesser degree of responses thought to reflect anxiety and depressive-like behaviors than any of the other groups. Rats treated with analgesics to alleviate possible pain from the blast ate more than their counterparts that were not treated with analgesics, which supports that both analgesics were effective in alleviating some of the discomfort that these rats potentially experienced post-blast injury. These results suggest that meloxicam and, to a lesser extent buprenorphine alter a variety of neurobehavioral functions in a rat bTBI model and, because of their impact on these neurobehavioral changes, may be less than ideal analgesic agents for pre-clinical studies evaluating these neurobehavioral responses after TBI.

Highlights

  • Blast-induced traumatic brain injury in rodents is a widely used preclinical model for the injury in humans, especially deployed service members exposed to blast

  • Animals treated with buprenorphine before blast exposure (BB+BUP) took significantly longer to right themselves after isoflurane anesthesia and blast exposure than those animals with no blast exposure and not treated with pain medication, those exposed to repeated blast without pain medication (BB), or those exposed to repeated blast and given meloxicam (BB+MEL) (∗∗p < 0.01, Figure 1)

  • Repeated blastexposed rats treated with either meloxicam or buprenorphine did not show a statistically significant decrease in performance scores as compared to sham animals on days 1, 7, and 14; on day 28, the decreased mean performance scores were significantly different from sham (∗p < 0.05) (Figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) in rodents is a widely used preclinical model for the injury in humans, especially deployed service members exposed to blast. Estimates of numbers of service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan who sustained a concussion, called a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) during their deployment, is between 12 and 18% [1,2,3]. It has been estimated that up to 79% of the mTBI cases experienced by deployed service members are related to blast exposures [2,3,4]. These injuries may or may not involve loss of consciousness or altered mental status. Animal models of bTBI aim to define the underlying etiology in order to identify therapeutic targets and appropriate interventions to enhance overall patient recovery beyond symptomatic treatments

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call