Abstract

Due to increased privatization of development assistance, humanitarian communication is usually considered to be the domain of non-governmental organizations. However, (inter)governmental and (supra)national institutions still play an important role in development assistance. Notably, the European Union has become a leading development actor globally – and also actively brands itself as such. In this process of branding, the European Union not only celebrates its empathic recognition of vulnerable non-European Others, but also aims to promote a sense of European citizenship. In this article, we examine this process in the context of The Family Meal, a 2014 awareness campaign on food assistance led by the Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department of the European Commission. We argue that the campaign reflects both the logic of neoliberal humanitarianism and the quest for European citizenship. To develop our argument, we will assess The Family Meal in three steps. First, we discuss how the campaign mimicked post-humanitarian tendencies in non-governmental campaigns aimed at raising funds. Second, we demonstrate how The Family Meal not only reported on (helping) non-European Others, but also, and importantly, promoted a sense of European belonging. Finally, we introduce the concept of successional campaigns – that is, campaigns that follow up on the action taken rather than preceding it – to show that The Family Meal largely appeared as the result of the neoliberal trend toward administering accountability and branding organizations. Altogether, we consider the campaign, with the neoliberal branding of the European Union and its citizens at its center, as emblematic for humanitarian communication within the rise of New Public Management in the 21st century.

Highlights

  • In order to understand this, we direct our attention toward a specific aspect of post-humanitarianism that The Family Meal campaign (at least partially) seems to defy; that is, the fact that the benefactors, ‘the European tax-payers’, were not addressed as individuals but as a group

  • In 2014, the Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department of the European Commission (ECHO), in partnership with the UN World Food Programme (WFP), launched a new awareness campaign on food assistance called The Family Meal

  • We will show that the fortunate/unfortunate relationship suggested in The Family Meal campaign was, though, taking place within a governmental framework, informed by traditional forms of humanitarian communication

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to understand this, we direct our attention toward a specific aspect of post-humanitarianism that The Family Meal campaign (at least partially) seems to defy; that is, the fact that the benefactors, ‘the European tax-payers’, were not addressed as individuals but as a group. His mission of improving the (family) life of people through fresh ingredients and home cooking has been understood as a more general appeal to neoliberal responsibility (Slocum et al, 2011: 178) and good citizenship (Hollows and Jones, 2010).10 Oliver’s rejection of hastiness and fast-food in favor of authentic (g)locality fitted the campaign well and aligned with what Chouliaraki (2013) contends to be ‘the emergence of a self-oriented morality’ that requires a gratification of the self by doing good to others.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call