Abstract

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease are characteristically associated with an increased likelihood of disease. Prospective studies of incident disease are less prone to bias than cross-sectional or case-control studies of prevalent disease. Meta-analyses of prospective studies provide more reliable estimates of the strength of association of risk factors with risk of disease than individual studies. Meta-analyses of intervention studies provide the most reliable estimates of reversibility of disease risk through prolonged reduction of classical risk factors (e.g., blood pressure, serum cholesterol). Emerging potential risk factors include markers of infection, inflammation, and thrombosis; their possible roles in causation and in risk prediction require much further study.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.