Abstract

This article provides a critique of the proposed Development-In-Context Evaluation (DICE) model as a prevention approachfor children, adolescents, andfamilies who are at risk. An analysis of the model's theoretical basis, referred to as developmental contextualism, is provided and the proposed prevention strategy's strengths and weaknesses are assessed. Although the DICE model offers a comprehensive approach to prevention and has many positive aspects, problems may result from disproportionate reliance on community involvement and a somewhat restricted role for university-based scholars. Insufficient attention is devoted to the identification of common pninciples for prevention strategies which generalize across local interests, foster equality of circumstances, andfunction to integrate the larger society.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.