The Necessity of Routine Pre-operative Group and Save Testing for Emergency Appendectomies.

Abstract

Background Pre-surgical group and save (G&S) tests are routine but can result in unnecessary expense and theatre delays. The objective of this study was to assess the necessity of G&S testing prior to appendectomy and evaluate the cost implications. Methods This retrospective study analysed the records of 200 patients with appendicitis who underwent emergency appendectomies at a busy general surgery department between March 2021 to August 2022. The study adhered to local clinical governance unit protocol and the Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCCS) guidelines. Patients who had elective appendectomies or other emergency procedures were excluded. Data was collected on age, gender, number of samples and requirement for perioperative transfusion. Comparisons were drawn between patients who underwent laparoscopic, open or converted emergency appendectomies. Results Of the sample population, (median age 32, 55.5% male), 93.5% had valid preoperative G&S tests. None required perioperative blood transfusions. 26% of the patients only required one sample for a valid G&S due to having previous sample in the lab; 55% required two samples; 7% needed a third sample because one initial sample was rejected; and 5.5% required four samples because the initial two samples were rejected. The total cost of these samples was estimated to be £3,500.14. Conclusion Emergency appendectomy poses minimal risk of resulting in the need for blood transfusions. Reevaluating the need for routine preoperative G&S testing and adopting a risk-benefit analysis approach could have a financial benefit for the NHS.