Abstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss the notion of the so called unifying opinion, an instrument of the Czech supreme courts for unification of Czech case law. This instrument is said to be a relic of socialist legal systems, surviving in the legal systems of postcommunist countries. It has been subject of criticism from some of the Czech as well as foreign legal theorists, especially due to the fact that it seems to be a significant flaw in the division of powers concept, an inherent element of the Rechtstaat (State of Law). Does this instrument of unifying opinions pose any threat to the modern notion of Rechtsaat?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
