Abstract

How does Frege conceive of logic, if not in modal terms? For Frege, logic is a system of truths that divides into primitive truths, which are axioms or basic laws, and logical truths justified by primitive logical truths. Frege appears to hold that what makes a thought a primitive logical truth is that it provides its own justification. However, Frege appears also to give arguments for the basic laws of Frege’s systems of logic. I argue that these arguments cannot be understood as non-question-begging demonstrations that the basic laws are self-justifying. Knowledge of self-justification results from the exercise of a perception-like capacity, and Frege’s “arguments” are intended to provide his readers with the occasion to exercise this capacity with respect to the thoughts expressed by his basic logical laws.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call