Abstract

This study empirically examines an alternative conceptual approach to the nature of importance perceptions. Current interpretations of importance evaluations—demand, need, and value-based approaches—have been primarily connotative and continue to remain bereft of convincing logical or empirical support. Borrowing from social — psychological theories of cognitive structure, the study tests the usefulness of a conceptualization of importance perceptions which presents the construct as a function of cognitive centrality, dependence, criticalness, and temporary salience of factors and outcomes in the individual cognitive space. The model is examined over a wide range of factors with findings indicating that significant proportions of variance in importance rating/rankings may be thus explained. Implications for management theory and practices are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call