Abstract

Ethnoprimatology is an important and growing discipline, studying the diverse relationships between humans and primates. However there is a danger that too great a focus on primates as important to humans may obscure the importance of other animal groups to local people. The Waorani of Amazonian Ecuador were described by Sponsel [Sponsel (1997) New World Primates: Ecology, evolution and behavior. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 143–165] as the “natural place” for ethnoprimatology, because of their close relationship to primates, including primates forming a substantial part of their diet. Therefore they are an ideal group in which to examine contemporary perceptions of primates in comparison to other types of animal. We examine how Waorani living in Yasuní National Park name and categorize primates and other common mammals. Although there is some evidence that the Waorani consider primates a unique group, the non-primate kinkajou and olingo are also included as part of the group “monkeys,” and no evidence was found that primates were more important than other mammals to Waorani culture. Instead, a small number of key species, in particular the woolly monkey (Lagothrix poeppigii) and white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari), were found to be both important in the diet and highly culturally salient. These results have implications for both ethnoprimatologists and those working with local communities towards broader conservation goals. Firstly, researchers should ensure that they and local communities are referring to the same animals when they use broad terms such as “monkey,” and secondly the results caution ethnoprimatologists against imposing western taxonomic groups on indigenous peoples, rather than allowing them to define themselves which species are important. Am. J. Primatol. 75:1117–1128, 2013. © 2013 The Authors. American Journal of Primatology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Highlights

  • Ethnoprimatology is a subiscipline of primatology which aims to understand the interconnections between humans and other primates, often with the ultimate aim of informing conservation [Fuentes & Hockings, 2010]

  • Previous research has emphasized the cultural importance of primates in traditional Waorani society [e.g., Rival, 1993]

  • Given the extensive changes in Waorani society in the 50 years since first western contact, the results of this study should not be interpreted as representing traditional Waorani perceptions of primates and other animals, but rather as observations on the contemporary ethnobiology of the Waorani

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ethnoprimatology is a subiscipline of primatology which aims to understand the interconnections between humans and other primates, often with the ultimate aim of informing conservation [Fuentes & Hockings, 2010]. Ethnoprimatological studies contrast with traditional research on wild primates, in that humans are viewed as an integral part of the primate ecosystem, rather than a source of disturbance or “unnatural” behavior [Fuentes, 2006, 2012; Riley, 2006]. Ethnobiology is the study of human biological knowledge (encompassing the subdisciplines of ethnobotany and ethnozoology which study plants and animals respectively), including culture, linguistics, use and management, and even aspects of archeobiology and archeobotany [Anderson, 2011], including only some aspects of ethnoprimatology. Anthrozoology is the study of human relationships with non‐human animals and includes both the subject area and methodologies of ethnoprimatology [Fuentes, 2012]. Fuentes [2012] argues that the “ethno” in ethnoprimatology has a different meaning in other ethno‐disciplines

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call