Abstract

Mykhailo Drahomanov’s political views are of considerable interest from the standpoint of the historical studies of Ukrainian national movement in the last quarter of the 19th century, relations of national movements with each other and with the imperial center. It may also be relevant for the theoretical comprehension of «nationalism» with regards to the analysis of current events. Drahomanov was not merely an active politician but also an ideologist who aimed to elaborate the theoretical framework to justify and to describe objectively his own activities and the activity of his allies and antagonists. Being the ideologist of Ukrainian «radicalism» (i.e. socialism) from 1870s, by the fall of 1880s Drahomanov found himself in an ideological confrontation - this time not with the Great Russian/Pan-Russian nationalists, imperials and Polish nationalists - with the Ukrainian national movement itself. In the end of the 1880s-beginning of the 1890s Drahomanov published a series of works which explained his understanding of the «national» and the prospects of the «Ukrainianism». Through the consideration of the separatist attitudes he insisted that there were no conditions of the emergence of the independent Ukrainian state without «the universal disaster». Hence, the aim of the Ukrainian movement is to change the political and administrative orders of the existing states. To do this they needed to propose attractive solutions for the majority of other participants of the political life. According to Drahomanov, for the Russian Empire it could be a federative reconstruction, which will give the opportunity to fulfill the national purposes on the local level regarding the power and maturity of national and/or local movements. These concerns, as he assumed, might be of interest not only to «plebeian nations», but also to the Great Russian population.

Highlights

  • Председательствовавший на Киевском (IV) археологическом съезде в 1874 г., говорил ему во время прогулки на пароходе по Днепру, что во враждебном отношении к себе тот во многом виноват своей манерой вести полемику: «Вам недостаточно разбить, вы хотите добить человека, показать, что он совсем дурак, даже тогда, когда и так видно уже, какой он»

  • Б. Анатоновича, характеризуя его в «Очерке украинской литературы» как человека, который «сделал очень много для обоснования того интеллигентного движения, что из украинофильского сделалось на самом деле украинским» (Франко, 1910: 146)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Киевской «Старой Громаде» Драгоманов писал 8.II.1886: Только не думайте, чтобы так уж легко было пролазить в европейскую прессу и еще и зарабатывать этим деньги. Чтобы весь секрет заключался в более удачной перевозке этих изданий, что, следовательно, при большей энергии в этом отношении с нашей стороны, все дело может измениться.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.