Abstract
Peer assessment ratings of graduate programs have been both highly cited and criticized as measures of program quality. This study analyzes factors that affect peer assessments of faculty quality and program effectiveness from the 1993 survey by the National Research Council. We found that the determinants for faculty quality and program effectiveness are very similar. Further, programs in private institutions and/or in institutions with more highly rated programs have higher ratings. Although program reputations evolve slowly, programmatic changes can influence them.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
