Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores a significant gap in research on Singlish by examining The Straits Times (ST) as a language planning and policy tool. Using representation theory, legitimisation theory, and framing, it analyzes ST’s media coverage of Singlish across two periods. The article demonstrates how ST has not merely reported on Singlish but has actively engaged in status planning by legitimizing Standard English and delegitimizing Singlish. It argues that while ST does not formulate Singapore’s English language policy, it plays a crucial role in shaping public attitudes and containing Singlish. By analyzing ST articles, the article reveals how Singlish was initially portrayed as a ‘bogeyman’ but later acknowledged for its identity functions, suggesting a shift in how Standard Singapore English and Singlish are perceived in different social contexts.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.